The Tesla CEO was the subject of analysis for his flippant way to deal with moving digital money markets.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk has been condemned for using what many see to be unreliable impact over the digital currency market. Musk routinely took to Twitter to post images and hot takes on different digital forms of money all through a large portion of 2021, not least Bitcoin (BTC) and Dogecoin (DOGE).
Musk before long added another coin to that rundown — CumRocket (CUMMIES). CumRocket is depicted as a “revolutionary deflationary token” intended to be utilized by those in the porno business.
On Friday, Musk posted a mysterious tweet with three words recorded: Canada, USA, Mexico. Eyewitnesses deciphered this as Musk shamelessly composing “CUM,” and in no time, the cost of a mostly secret token called CumRocket dramatically increased.
Quick forward 24 hours, and Musk was busy once more. This time he posted a succession of emoticons that could sensibly be deciphered as “CumRocket to the moon.”
Inside only 10 minutes, the cost of CumRocket hopped from $0.06 to $0.28 — a 366% increment. Typically, the speculative siphon didn’t keep going for long, and when of distribution, the CUMMIES token cost had fallen back to around $0.07.
One of the principal Bitcoin (BTC) trade administrators and fellow benefactor of Zap Protocol, Nick Spanos disclosed to Cointelegraph he accepts a lot of Musk’s market-moving movement is intended to fitting a greater number of resources at a less expensive cost than he in any case would have.
“Musk harmed countless people less fortunate than he in his selfish shilling and moves to get cheaper coin,” said Spanos.
The perfect representation of this, assuming valid, would maybe be Musk’s declaration that Tesla had bought $1.5 billion worth of Bitcoin and that the vehicle organization would acknowledge BTC for installment. Not exactly half a month later, Musk instituted a quick inversion of opinion on Bitcoin, which he disparaged for its ecological effect, and immediately eliminated it as an installment choice on the Tesla site.
Regardless of whether Musk just got exhausted of Bitcoin, his tweets to more than 50 million supporters add up to wildness and a maltreatment of trust, says Spanos.
“People believe in Bitcoin because it’s a path to monetary independence from central banks, and he’s attacking their trust with reckless tweets and abuse of influence. Instead of being a role model, he is revealing less favorable primal characteristics.”
Musk has recently said he would invite any examination by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission into the impact his tweets have had on the crypto market. Spanos said Musk’s egotism and covetousness should be paid for, regardless of whether to the SEC, or unknown programmer gatherings, like Anonymous. (Unknown has since rejected obligation for the video addressed to Elon Musk.)
“Arrogance and greed cannot shield him from consequences. If the SEC isn’t going to sanction him for manipulating markets like they did before, perhaps the activists will,” said Spanos.
“It’s not hard to imagine a scenario where people who trust their lives with his technology could see incidents where that trust maybe even catastrophically ends,” he added.
As announced by the BBC, one lady lost 9,000 British pounds ($12,700) in a Bitcoin trick that was erroneously introduced as an authority giveaway by Elon Musk. Such phony giveaways are the same old thing in the digital money space, yet would this one have happened if Musk wasn’t at that point putting himself at the up front of the cryptosphere?
Whatever the appropriate response, Spanos trusts Musk’s time would be better spent really utilizing and executing blockchain advances and concocting ways for individuals to arrive at their own degree of financial opportunity.
“If I were Elon, I would be double checking my penetration tests and spending more time implementing blockchain solutions — and finding ways to help the people rise to their highest level of freedom,” said Spanos.
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Blockchain News Site journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.